derelict-2224877_640.jpg

Vautin v BY Winddown, Inc

Facts

  • 74 feet long recreational fishing vessel bought in 2011;
  • Eagle Yachts Pty Ltd sold vessel and Bertram Yachts Inc made vessel;
  • vessel was defective due to manufacturing process causing delamination and lack of seaworthiness;
  • proceedings against Seller and manufacturer under Australian Consumer Law (ACL) (Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth));
  • purchaser disclosed the purpose of the vessel was to fish in the open seas, and the seller represented the vessel as suitable;
  • purchaser subsequently notified seller (and manufacturer);
  • manufacturer went “quiet” and did not fulfil warranty obligations;
  • subsequently the vessel was rejected, under ss54 (1) (i.e. acceptable quality) and 55 (1) (i.e. guarantee as to fitness for any disclosed purpose) of the ACL.

 

Issues

  • the nature and extent of the defects;
  • how the defect should be characterised under the ACL.

 

Judgement

  • construction of the vessel did not comply with the applicable ISO standard;
  • seller and manufacturer did not identify any standard with which the vessel had complied;
  • method of construction was poor boatbuilding practice;
  • seller and manufacturer argued that the vessel could be repaired whereas the purchaser disputed that;
  • vessel was not of acceptable quality;
  • vessel did not comply with the guarantee regarding fitness of a disclosed purpose;
  • purchaser was entitled to reject the vessel, and additionally claimed damages.

For more information about breaches of contract, contact our lawyers to discuss your case. 

* Disclaimer:- This publication contains general information which may not suit your particular needs or circumstances. It may be summarised and include generalisations. Details that may be important in your specific circumstances might not be included. Litigant strives to ensure that the information in this publication is accurate and up-to-date, but does not represent or guarantee that it is accurate, reliable, current, complete or suitable. You should independently evaluate and verify the accuracy, reliability, currency, completeness and suitability of the information, before you rely on it. The information in this publication is not legal or other professional advice. You should obtain independent legal or professional advice that is tailored to your particular circumstances if you have concerns. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Litigant excludes liability for any loss, however caused (including by negligence), relating to or arising directly or indirectly from using or relying on any content in this publication. Litigant asserts copyright over the content of this publication.