Opposing A Claim That A Contract Is Unjust - Contracts Review Act

Defending a claim that a contract is unjust requires close consideration of each of the elements required to prove a case. 

Usually, there are some obvious defences that may apply such as when: -

• the contract is not of a type that attracts the jurisdiction;
• the claim is brought outside of the time limit required;
• none of the factors that might make a contract unjust are present. 

It may also be possible to argue, once the jurisdiction is enlivened, that in the exercise of the discretion the court should not make the orders. 

If you are defending a claim that a contract is unjust contact us to book a conference to discuss the facts of your case. 

* Disclaimer:- This publication contains general information which may not suit your particular needs or circumstances. It may be summarised and include generalisations. Details that may be important in your specific circumstances might not be included. Litigant strives to ensure that the information in this publication is accurate and up-to-date, but does not represent or guarantee that it is accurate, reliable, current, complete or suitable. You should independently evaluate and verify the accuracy, reliability, currency, completeness and suitability of the information, before you rely on it. The information in this publication is not legal or other professional advice. You should obtain independent legal or professional advice that is tailored to your particular circumstances if you have concerns. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Litigant excludes liability for any loss, however caused (including by negligence), relating to or arising directly or indirectly from using or relying on any content in this publication. Litigant asserts copyright over the content of this publication.